Politics and networks at work are aspects of organizational dynamics, but they serve different functions and have distinct characteristics.

One of my clients is struggling with that, as he sees both as something negative and wrong.

I must confess that I was there too, and when you start doing something to improve and see the first results—you can do things either easier, faster, or better—then you realize that is a choice that might help.

If you are doubting those “tools” as well,  let me decode them below

Workplace Politics

Definition:

Workplace politics refers to the activities and behaviors employees engage in to gain power, influence decisions, and achieve personal or organizational objectives. It often involves informal, unofficial, and sometimes behind-the-scenes efforts to shape opinions, form alliances, and advance personal or group interests.

Characteristics:

1. Power and Influence: Central to politics is the pursuit of power and influence within the organization.
2. Strategic Behavior: Individuals often use strategic behaviors, which may include forming alliances, leveraging personal relationships, and sometimes engaging in manipulative tactics.
3. Positive or Negative Impact: Politics can be beneficial when it leads to positive outcomes like organizational change or effective problem-solving. However, it can also be detrimental, leading to conflicts, reduced morale, and a toxic work environment.
4. Decision-Making: Political maneuvering can significantly impact decision-making processes, often prioritizing personal or group interests over organizational goals.

Examples:

• Lobbying for a promotion.
• Forming a coalition to support a particular project.
• Undermining a colleague to gain a competitive advantage.

Workplace Networks

Definition:

Workplace networks refer to the web of relationships and connections that employees develop within and outside their organization. These networks can be formal (structured, organizational charts) or informal (personal relationships, mentorships).

Characteristics:

1. Relationship-Based: Networks are built on relationships and interactions, focusing on mutual benefits and collaboration.
2. Information and Resource Sharing: Networks facilitate the sharing of information, resources, and support among members.
3. Trust and reciprocity: Effective networks rely on trust and reciprocity, where individuals support each other and share knowledge.
4. Career Development: Networks often play a crucial role in career advancement, mentorship, and professional growth.

Examples:

• Participating in a professional association or industry group.
• Seeking mentorship from a senior colleague.
• Building a network of contacts across different departments.

Key Differences

1. Intent:
   • Politics: The primary intent is to gain power and influence, often for personal or specific group benefit.
   • Networks: The primary intent is to build relationships for mutual support, information sharing, and professional growth.
2. Nature of Interactions:
   • Politics: Interactions may be competitive, strategic, and sometimes manipulative.
   • Networks: Interactions are usually collaborative, supportive, and based on mutual trust.
3. Outcomes:
   • Politics: This can lead to both positive and negative outcomes, such as promotions or workplace conflicts.
   • Networks typically result in positive outcomes like career advancement, learning opportunities, and a supportive work environment.
4. Visibility:
   • Politics: often operates behind the scenes and can be less visible.
   • Networks: more visible and openly recognized as part of professional development.

Conclusion

While both politics and networks involve interpersonal interactions and influence within the workplace, politics focuses on power and influence, often through strategic and competitive means, while networks emphasize building relationships for mutual benefit, support, and professional growth. Understanding both dynamics is crucial for navigating organizational life effectively.